.Official news service of the US-Russia Press Club .

clipred.gif (185 bytes)   Inside_Russia
clipred.gif (185 bytes)   Key  issues

wpe3.jpg (3120 bytes)

Related stories

Inkombank Former Management May End Up Behind Bars

Witness in the Bank of New York Case Attacked

Banker Told to Submit Records.  New York Times, March 2, 2001

Bank of New York Loses Yet Another Round In Court

Judge in Bank of New York Case Concludes Charges are not Frivolous December 13, 2001 (MT)

BoNY Lawyers Argue in Court that Russian Justice Ministry is not a Government Body November 10, 2001 (MT-Wire)

Fallen Comrades" in Russiangate Drama. By: Emily Topol (MT) May 16, 2000

Judge Doubts the Bank of New York can Investigate Itself  NOV. 13 (MT-WIRE)

The Bank of New York  Management Attacks Director of American Russian Law Institute (MT 09/12/2000)

Inkombank chief says US officials bribed (MT) Nov. 5, 1999

Myths and Reality About The IMF Theft (MT)   Nov. 1999

Backgrounder: Benjamin Civiletti

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MYTHS AND REALITY ABOUT THE IMF THEFT

November 1999

Much has been said about the possibility that the funds provided to Russia by the International Monetary Fund were stolen and laundered through the US banks to the offshore coffers of the perpetrators. In a letter addressed to then Secretary of the Treasury Rubin on October 31, 1998, House Majority Leader Dick Armey and Representative Jim Saxton, warned that the billions of the IMF dollars July 15, 1998 provided to Russia last year was lost in "illegal arrangements" and further that "a substantial amount of the American taxpayer money to the IMF may now be financing the lavish lifestyles of Russian oligarchs". Few weeks before the Russian banks officially announced themselves insolvent, Pat Buchanan said "The Russian economy is a corpse. That $15 billion, which comes on top of the $9 billion the IMF has already committed and on top of the scores of billions from Europe and the United States, will never be seen again."

The IMF took the position that it loans directly to the Russian federal government and has no way of knowing or monitoring how the funds are allocated or used thereafter. Recent report in the Wall Street Journal states that "an independent review" of the CBR by PricewaterhouseCoopers made at the behest of the IMF concluded that although the CBR misled the IMF as regards the use of its foreign subsidiaries the review turned out no evidence that the IMF funds were stolen and the auditors found "nothing criminal" in the operations of the CBR foreign subsidiaries. Everybody appears to be relieved - the IMF and the Central Bank of Russia are "in the clear" (after all, CBR has only "misled" the grantor of the tens of billions of dollars - "nothing criminal" about that.)

Perhaps Mr. Camdessus resigned too hastily?

Regrettably, the IMF review by PricewaterhouseCoopers has not been made public. However, the published reports about the IMF audit of the CBR do little in assuaging concerns expressed by Buchanan and Armey. Between the years of 1992 to 1996 the IMF loaned Russia $22 billion dollars (give or take). If the money was not stolen, where is it? There is no dispute that it wasn’t paid back. Likewise, few would seriously argue that these billions never accomplished the intended purpose, i.e., to stabilize Russian economy -- indeed the Russian economy is worse off than it was before the IMF monies were provided. This sorrowful fact notwithstanding, the Russian oligarches’ personal financial picture is much improved (perhaps by $22 billion, give or take?)

Another peculiar fact: the report mentions that no evidence of criminalities turned up as regards the CBR subsidiaries in France, Germany, Britain, Luxembourg and Austria, but is silent with respect to CBR’s most controversial offshore "subsidiary" FIMACO, an obscure Channel Islands outfit, controlled by the CBR official. In February of 1999 Russia admitted that from 1993 to 1998, the Russian Central Bank had hidden $50 billion of, which included the IMF monies in this shell company.<1>

Also, it is not exactly clear why would the Russian Central Bank need to move the nation’s monetary funds through the foreign subsidiaries in the first place and mislead the IMF as to their use. "It's though the U.S. Federal Reserve secretly ran money through the Cayman Islands" correctly compare Bill Powell and Yevgenia Albats in their March 1999 Newsweek article "The latest Kremlin scandal involves billions of dollars moving offshore...". <2> Newsweek asserts that the IMF was aware at the time that the Central Bank was placing monies at its European subsidiaries. Responding to the allegations of illegal machinations with the IMF funds, former chairman of the Central Bank of Russia, Sergey Dubinin insisted that the central bank had kept the IMF informed. "It was not news for the IMF", said Dubinin in a television interview. IMF spokeswoman confirmed that the IMF knew the Russian central bank was managing much of its international reserves through European subsidiaries, but denied the knowledge about FIMACO.

Admissions of the Russian Officials

In September of last year, Russia's chief state auditor, Venyamin Sokolov, admitted on the BBC's Money Programme: "We have checked a fair proportion of the <IMF> loans and I'm ashamed to say that several billion dollars has not been used for its intended purpose and some of it was simply stolen." Sokolov, was quoted as urging the West not to give more money unless better supervisory measures were in place.<4>

The admissions of Russia’s Chief Auditor were cautiously corroborated by then Minister of Internal Security, Sergei Stepashin and the Prosecutor General of Russia, Yuri Skuratov. In December of 1998, Stepashin said that security forces were conducting a detailed investigation into the allegations that billions of dollars, which included the proceeds of the IMF loans were spirited away from the central bank. CBR officials conceded that there was a $9 billion flight of capital abroad soon after the August crisis erupted -- money that has simply disappeared.<5> A few weeks later Skuratov publicly acknowledged that Russian government officials may have illegally used a $4.8 billion IMF loan given to Russia in July of 1998, admitting that "there was a series of suspicious operations involving the money from the (IMF) tranche" <6> The $4.8 billion IMF loan given to Russia in July of 1998, evaporated two weeks prior to August 1998, when Russia simultaneously devalued the rouble and defaulted on its debt. <7>

Also, in September of this year, the independent member of the Russian Parliament, Duma, Nicolay Gonchar explained: "The system was created in the Russian Federation whereby the highest financial elite of the nation gets personal income, while dragging the country deeper into debt." According to Gonchar, billions of dollars, including the IMF funds given to the CBR were transferred to FIMACO, and used for improper purposes, including market manipulations and paying huge interest on Russia’s own currency reserves, with the profits possibly ending up in private pockets. <8>

The chairman of the Duma Committee on Security, V. Ilyukhin, wrote to Skuratov that the IMF loans did not make it to Russia but were "distributed" to the secret foreign accounts controlled by the highest Russian officials as follows: $2.35 billion to the Bank of Sydney, and $2.115 billion to the National Westminster Bank (London) $780 million to Credit Suisse, $270 million to the Lausanne branch of Creditanschtalt-Bankferein (Switzerland) and $1.4 billion to the Bank of New York. Ilyukhin said he had traced part of the IMF credit to an Australian company in which Yeltsin's daughter, Tatyana Dyachenko, allegedly has a large stake. "We believe", wrote Ilyukhin, "that the above named operations were executed with the participation of the former Central Bank of RF Chairman, Sergey Dubinin." <9>

Why have the IMF’s auditors, after examining the books of the sovereign come to the conclusion which is so dramatically at odds with the admissions of the top officials of the sovereign itself? Could it be because another exposee-report would bring further scrutiny upon the IMF failed Russian policies? Another Newsweek article in March of this year states: "No matter how much the IMF wants everyone to believe that they are in Moscow to play hardball ... this is not exactly the stuff of white-knuckle suspense. Even after watching Moscow devalue its currency, default on its ruble debt and allow its horribly managed banks to stiff their creditors and steal their depositors' money, the world is once again likely to come to Russia's aid."<10>

One may wonder what would the IMF, funded to a large extent by the US taxpayers but entirely self regulated, consider "evidence" that the money it gave to Russia was indeed stolen. A dollar bill stamped "STOLEN FROM THE IMF" with Yeltsyn’s signature across?

Related articles: